diff options
author | Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net> | 2019-05-14 18:01:44 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Florin Coras <florin.coras@gmail.com> | 2019-05-16 16:11:23 +0000 |
commit | f8d50682cd1245f6f5ce4c846ca6f1bdc11255a6 (patch) | |
tree | 8ecc60e4715db88bdbc8ea6bd0170fbae6f645eb /src/vnet/adj/adj_glean.c | |
parent | c1f93067ed4b9954bbba82e2c9c104b22e2f7f33 (diff) |
init / exit function ordering
The vlib init function subsystem now supports a mix of procedural and
formally-specified ordering constraints. We should eliminate procedural
knowledge wherever possible.
The following schemes are *roughly* equivalent:
static clib_error_t *init_runs_first (vlib_main_t *vm)
{
clib_error_t *error;
... do some stuff...
if ((error = vlib_call_init_function (init_runs_next)))
return error;
...
}
VLIB_INIT_FUNCTION (init_runs_first);
and
static clib_error_t *init_runs_first (vlib_main_t *vm)
{
... do some stuff...
}
VLIB_INIT_FUNCTION (init_runs_first) =
{
.runs_before = VLIB_INITS("init_runs_next"),
};
The first form will [most likely] call "init_runs_next" on the
spot. The second form means that "init_runs_first" runs before
"init_runs_next," possibly much earlier in the sequence.
Please DO NOT construct sets of init functions where A before B
actually means A *right before* B. It's not necessary - simply combine
A and B - and it leads to hugely annoying debugging exercises when
trying to switch from ad-hoc procedural ordering constraints to formal
ordering constraints.
Change-Id: I5e4353503bf43b4acb11a45fb33c79a5ade8426c
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/vnet/adj/adj_glean.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions