diff options
author | Rastislav Szabo <raszabo@cisco.com> | 2017-05-04 11:09:03 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rastislav Szabo <raszabo@cisco.com> | 2017-05-04 11:12:35 +0200 |
commit | a101d966133a70b8a76526be25070436d14fcf9f (patch) | |
tree | 75e2dbf20de615e58252b780b2ba5baae8fdcf82 /vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct/fields_test.go | |
parent | a968ead74525125dff9ae90b1c9a9102e4327900 (diff) |
initial commit
Signed-off-by: Rastislav Szabo <raszabo@cisco.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct/fields_test.go')
-rw-r--r-- | vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct/fields_test.go | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct/fields_test.go b/vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct/fields_test.go new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61f4afc --- /dev/null +++ b/vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct/fields_test.go @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +package gstruct_test + +import ( + . "github.com/onsi/ginkgo" + . "github.com/onsi/gomega" + . "github.com/onsi/gomega/gstruct" +) + +var _ = Describe("Struct", func() { + allFields := struct{ A, B string }{"a", "b"} + missingFields := struct{ A string }{"a"} + extraFields := struct{ A, B, C string }{"a", "b", "c"} + emptyFields := struct{ A, B string }{} + + It("should strictly match all fields", func() { + m := MatchAllFields(Fields{ + "B": Equal("b"), + "A": Equal("a"), + }) + Ω(allFields).Should(m, "should match all fields") + Ω(missingFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with missing fields") + Ω(extraFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with extra fields") + Ω(emptyFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with empty fields") + + m = MatchAllFields(Fields{ + "A": Equal("a"), + "B": Equal("fail"), + }) + Ω(allFields).ShouldNot(m, "should run nested matchers") + }) + + It("should handle empty structs", func() { + m := MatchAllFields(Fields{}) + Ω(struct{}{}).Should(m, "should handle empty structs") + Ω(allFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with extra fields") + }) + + It("should ignore missing fields", func() { + m := MatchFields(IgnoreMissing, Fields{ + "B": Equal("b"), + "A": Equal("a"), + }) + Ω(allFields).Should(m, "should match all fields") + Ω(missingFields).Should(m, "should ignore missing fields") + Ω(extraFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with extra fields") + Ω(emptyFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with empty fields") + }) + + It("should ignore extra fields", func() { + m := MatchFields(IgnoreExtras, Fields{ + "B": Equal("b"), + "A": Equal("a"), + }) + Ω(allFields).Should(m, "should match all fields") + Ω(missingFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with missing fields") + Ω(extraFields).Should(m, "should ignore extra fields") + Ω(emptyFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with empty fields") + }) + + It("should ignore missing and extra fields", func() { + m := MatchFields(IgnoreMissing|IgnoreExtras, Fields{ + "B": Equal("b"), + "A": Equal("a"), + }) + Ω(allFields).Should(m, "should match all fields") + Ω(missingFields).Should(m, "should ignore missing fields") + Ω(extraFields).Should(m, "should ignore extra fields") + Ω(emptyFields).ShouldNot(m, "should fail with empty fields") + + m = MatchFields(IgnoreMissing|IgnoreExtras, Fields{ + "A": Equal("a"), + "B": Equal("fail"), + }) + Ω(allFields).ShouldNot(m, "should run nested matchers") + }) +}) |