diff options
author | Rastislav Szabo <raszabo@cisco.com> | 2017-05-04 11:09:03 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rastislav Szabo <raszabo@cisco.com> | 2017-05-04 11:12:35 +0200 |
commit | a101d966133a70b8a76526be25070436d14fcf9f (patch) | |
tree | 75e2dbf20de615e58252b780b2ba5baae8fdcf82 /vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/matchers/consist_of_test.go | |
parent | a968ead74525125dff9ae90b1c9a9102e4327900 (diff) |
initial commit
Signed-off-by: Rastislav Szabo <raszabo@cisco.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/matchers/consist_of_test.go')
-rw-r--r-- | vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/matchers/consist_of_test.go | 75 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/matchers/consist_of_test.go b/vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/matchers/consist_of_test.go new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcd1afe --- /dev/null +++ b/vendor/github.com/onsi/gomega/matchers/consist_of_test.go @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +package matchers_test + +import ( + . "github.com/onsi/ginkgo" + . "github.com/onsi/gomega" +) + +var _ = Describe("ConsistOf", func() { + Context("with a slice", func() { + It("should do the right thing", func() { + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("foo", "bar", "baz")) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("foo", "bar", "baz")) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("baz", "bar", "foo")) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("baz", "bar", "foo", "foo")) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("baz", "foo")) + }) + }) + + Context("with an array", func() { + It("should do the right thing", func() { + Ω([3]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("foo", "bar", "baz")) + Ω([3]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("baz", "bar", "foo")) + Ω([3]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("baz", "bar", "foo", "foo")) + Ω([3]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("baz", "foo")) + }) + }) + + Context("with a map", func() { + It("should apply to the values", func() { + Ω(map[int]string{1: "foo", 2: "bar", 3: "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("foo", "bar", "baz")) + Ω(map[int]string{1: "foo", 2: "bar", 3: "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("baz", "bar", "foo")) + Ω(map[int]string{1: "foo", 2: "bar", 3: "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("baz", "bar", "foo", "foo")) + Ω(map[int]string{1: "foo", 2: "bar", 3: "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("baz", "foo")) + }) + + }) + + Context("with anything else", func() { + It("should error", func() { + failures := InterceptGomegaFailures(func() { + Ω("foo").Should(ConsistOf("f", "o", "o")) + }) + + Ω(failures).Should(HaveLen(1)) + }) + }) + + Context("when passed matchers", func() { + It("should pass if the matchers pass", func() { + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("foo", MatchRegexp("^ba"), "baz")) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("foo", MatchRegexp("^ba"))) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("foo", MatchRegexp("^ba"), MatchRegexp("foo"))) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf("foo", MatchRegexp("^ba"), MatchRegexp("^ba"))) + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf("foo", MatchRegexp("^ba"), MatchRegexp("turducken"))) + }) + + It("should not depend on the order of the matchers", func() { + Ω([][]int{[]int{1, 2}, []int{2}}).Should(ConsistOf(ContainElement(1), ContainElement(2))) + Ω([][]int{[]int{1, 2}, []int{2}}).Should(ConsistOf(ContainElement(2), ContainElement(1))) + }) + + Context("when a matcher errors", func() { + It("should soldier on", func() { + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).ShouldNot(ConsistOf(BeFalse(), "foo", "bar")) + Ω([]interface{}{"foo", "bar", false}).Should(ConsistOf(BeFalse(), ContainSubstring("foo"), "bar")) + }) + }) + }) + + Context("when passed exactly one argument, and that argument is a slice", func() { + It("should match against the elements of that argument", func() { + Ω([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"}).Should(ConsistOf([]string{"foo", "bar", "baz"})) + }) + }) +}) |