HC2VPP-253 - Bump routing models

This patch updates (for support of SRv6 and MPLS) routing models to:
- hc2vpp-ietf-routing@2018-03-13.yang
  (RFC 8349, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8349)
- hc2vpp-ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing@2018-03-13.yang (RFC 8349)
- hc2vpp-ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing@2018-03-13.yang (RFC 8349)
- hc2vpp-ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements@2018-03-13 (RFC 8349)
- hc2vpp-ietf-routing-types@2017-12-04
  (RFC 8294 ,https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8294)
Due to odl bugs these models were changed,
see HC2VPP-298 for more details.

Significant changes in updated models:
- Routing instance was removed, we used vpp-routing-instance
  as single instance before, which is no longer needed.
- Routing-protocol and Routing-protocols were refactored to
  Control-plane-protocol/s. Control-protocol now uses type and name as key
- Route Key was changed from id to ipPrefix
- Next-hop and Next-Hop-list were refactored
See attached routing_postman_collection.json for updated data structures
and examples for both IPv4 and IPv6 routes.
For router advertisements see routing_advertisments_postman_collection.json

Another fixes in this patch:
- fixes in MPLS module due to Routing model updates
- fixes doc module due to changes in Routing model

Change-Id: I33704a50061aef97dfbd73a7701ff6fe5274d6f0
Signed-off-by: Michal Cmarada <michal.cmarada@pantheon.tech>

1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/routing/routing-impl/src/test/java/io/fd/hc2vpp/routing/write/ControlPlaneProtocolCustomizerTest.java b/routing/routing-impl/src/test/java/io/fd/hc2vpp/routing/write/ControlPlaneProtocolCustomizerTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fa25520ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/routing/routing-impl/src/test/java/io/fd/hc2vpp/routing/write/ControlPlaneProtocolCustomizerTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 Cisco and/or its affiliates.
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at:
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package io.fd.hc2vpp.routing.write;
+
+import static io.fd.hc2vpp.routing.helpers.RoutingRequestTestHelper.ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME;
+import static io.fd.hc2vpp.routing.helpers.RoutingRequestTestHelper.ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME_2;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
+
+import io.fd.hc2vpp.common.test.write.WriterCustomizerTest;
+import io.fd.hc2vpp.common.translate.util.NamingContext;
+import io.fd.honeycomb.translate.write.WriteFailedException;
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.ietf.routing.rev180313.Direct;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.ietf.routing.rev180313.Static;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.ietf.routing.rev180313.routing.control.plane.protocols.ControlPlaneProtocol;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.ietf.routing.rev180313.routing.control.plane.protocols.ControlPlaneProtocolBuilder;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.vpp.routing.rev180319.RoutingProtocolVppAttr;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.vpp.routing.rev180319.RoutingProtocolVppAttrBuilder;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.vpp.routing.rev180319.routing.control.plane.protocols.control.plane.protocol.VppProtocolAttributesBuilder;
+import org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.ietf.params.xml.ns.yang.vpp.routing.types.rev180406.VniReference;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.binding.InstanceIdentifier;
+
+public class ControlPlaneProtocolCustomizerTest extends WriterCustomizerTest {
+
+    private InstanceIdentifier<ControlPlaneProtocol> validId;
+    private ControlPlaneProtocol validData;
+    private ControlPlaneProtocol validData2;
+    private ControlPlaneProtocol invalidData;
+    private ControlPlaneProtocolCustomizer customizer;
+    private NamingContext routingProtocolContext;
+
+    @Before
+    public void init() {
+        validId = InstanceIdentifier.create(ControlPlaneProtocol.class);
+        validData = new ControlPlaneProtocolBuilder()
+                .setName(ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME)
+                .setType(Static.class)
+                .addAugmentation(RoutingProtocolVppAttr.class, new RoutingProtocolVppAttrBuilder()
+                        .setVppProtocolAttributes(new VppProtocolAttributesBuilder()
+                                .setPrimaryVrf(new VniReference(1L))
+                                .build())
+                        .build())
+                .build();
+
+        validData2= new ControlPlaneProtocolBuilder()
+                .setName(ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME_2)
+                .setType(Static.class)
+                .addAugmentation(RoutingProtocolVppAttr.class, new RoutingProtocolVppAttrBuilder()
+                        .setVppProtocolAttributes(new VppProtocolAttributesBuilder()
+                                .setPrimaryVrf(new VniReference(1L))
+                                .build())
+                        .build())
+                .build();
+
+        invalidData = new ControlPlaneProtocolBuilder()
+                .setType(Direct.class)
+                .build();
+
+        routingProtocolContext = new NamingContext("routing-protocol", "routing-protocol-context");
+        customizer = new ControlPlaneProtocolCustomizer(routingProtocolContext);
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void testWriteIsStatic() throws WriteFailedException {
+        noMappingDefined(mappingContext, ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME, "routing-protocol-context");
+        try {
+            customizer.writeCurrentAttributes(validId, validData, writeContext);
+        } catch (Exception e) {
+            fail("Test should have passed without throwing exception");
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Should not fail, just ignore re-mapping same name
+     * */
+    @Test
+    public void testWriteIsStaticSameAllreadyExist() throws WriteFailedException {
+        defineMapping(mappingContext, ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME, 1, "routing-protocol-context");
+        try {
+            customizer.writeCurrentAttributes(validId, validData, writeContext);
+        } catch (Exception e) {
+            fail("Test should have passed without throwing exception");
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Should fail, because of attempt to map different name to same index
+     * */
+    @Test
+    public void testWriteIsStaticOtherAllreadyExist() throws WriteFailedException {
+        defineMapping(mappingContext, ROUTE_PROTOCOL_NAME, 1, "routing-protocol-context");
+        try {
+            customizer.writeCurrentAttributes(validId, validData2, writeContext);
+        } catch (Exception e) {
+            assertTrue(e instanceof IllegalStateException);
+            return;
+        }
+        fail("Test should have thrown exception");
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void testWriteIsntStatic() throws WriteFailedException {
+        try {
+            customizer.writeCurrentAttributes(validId, invalidData, writeContext);
+        } catch (Exception e) {
+            assertTrue(e instanceof IllegalArgumentException);
+            return;
+        }
+        fail("Test should have thrown exception");
+    }
+
+    @Test(expected = UnsupportedOperationException.class)
+    public void testUpdate() throws WriteFailedException {
+        customizer.updateCurrentAttributes(validId, validData, validData, writeContext);
+    }
+}