Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
1 - interface-DPO
Used in the Data-plane to change a packet's input interface
2 - MPLS multicast FIB entry
Same as a unicast entry but it links to a replicate not a load-balance DPO
3 - Multicast MPLS tunnel
Update MPLS tunnels to use a FIB path-list to describe the endpoint[s]. Use the path-list to generate the forwarding chain (DPOs) to link to .
4 - Resolve a path via a local label (of an mLDP LSP)
For IP multicast entries to use an LSP in the replication list, we need to decribe the 'resolve-via-label' where the label is that of a multicast LSP.
5 - MPLS disposition path sets RPF-ID
For a interface-less LSP (i.e. mLDP not RSVP-TE) at the tail of the LSP we still need to perform an RPF check. An MPLS disposition DPO performs the MPLS pop validation checks and sets the RPF-ID in the packet.
6 - RPF check with per-entry RPF-ID
An RPF-ID is used instead of a real interface SW if index in the case the IP traffic arrives from an LSP that does not have an associated interface.
Change-Id: Ib92e177be919147bafeb599729abf3d1abc2f4b3
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Multiple DHCP (4 and/or 6) servers can be added and removed through multiple calls to the 'set dhcp server' API.
All 4/6/ discover/solicit messages will then be replicated to all servers in the list. The expectation is that the servers/system is configured in such a way that this is viable.
If VSS information is providied for the clinet VRF which also has multiple servers configured, then the same VSS information is sent to each server. Likewise the source address of packets sent to from VPP to each server is the same.
Change-Id: I3287cb084c84b3f612b78bc69cfcb5b9c1f8934d
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
DHCPv6. For the same table ID, the unicast-FIB index is not necessarily the same value as the multicast-FIB index, since features (like LISP, SR) can create unicast-tables, and thus affect only the index of the unicast FIBs
Change-Id: Ibfa334d7eda822f742c241b7ce69a6271b4753a9
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Removed a fair number of "BUG" message handlers, due to conflicts with
actual message handlers in api_format.c. Vpp itself had no business
receiving certain messages, up to the point where we started building
in relevant code from vpp_api_test.
Eliminated all but one duplicate registration complaint. That one
needs attention from the vxlan team since the duplicated handlers have
diverged.
Change-Id: Iafce5429d2f906270643b4ea5f0130e20beb4d1d
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
|
|
Change-Id: I49e5ce0aae6e4ff634024387ceaf7dbc432a0351
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
Signed-off-by: Florin Coras <fcoras@cisco.com>
|
|
The DHCP proxy and VSS information maintained by VPP is the same for v4 and v6, so we can manage this state using the same code.
Packet handling is cleary different, so this is kept separate.
Change-Id: I10f10cc1f7f19debcd4c4b099c6de64e56bb0c69
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
DHCP additions:
1) DHCPv4 will only relay a message back to the client, if the Option82 information is present. So make this the default.
2) It is no longer possible to select via the API to "insert circuit ID" - since this is now default
3) Remove the version 2 API since it's now the same as version 1.
4) Adding the VSS option is now conditional only on the presence of VSS config (not the 'insert' option in the set API)
5) DHCP proxy dump via API
Change-Id: Ia7271ba8c1d4dbf34a02c401d268ccfbb1b74f17
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I6aaf9c602cd515ed9d4416d286f9191d048c1a87
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3829835ed2126e51e96690c907deac623dc77151
Signed-off-by: Pavel Kotucek <pkotucek@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7b51f88292e057c6443b12224486f2d0c9f8ae23
Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com>
|