diff options
author | Vratko Polak <vrpolak@cisco.com> | 2019-02-15 13:03:23 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tibor Frank <tifrank@cisco.com> | 2019-02-15 13:25:21 +0000 |
commit | cc5914d182053c300785771860424ae2d76a50c9 (patch) | |
tree | 6b17d2b1ab7c7ecfb981a4408317cff279c3b132 /docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst | |
parent | 1647a072a8b6785e6d712643225d66a4446c8c98 (diff) |
Improve PLRsearch graphical example
+ Two graphs now.
+ Larger font in graphs.
+ More descriptions within graphs.
+ Text before graphs explaining what is shown.
Change-Id: I1da6b55abe7380b61988e03d83f34f7f991085d6
Signed-off-by: Vratko Polak <vrpolak@cisco.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst | 56 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst b/docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst index 7529acae6e..65ac590222 100644 --- a/docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst +++ b/docs/report/introduction/methodology_plrsearch.rst @@ -338,12 +338,50 @@ as the observed trends have varied characteristics. Probably, using a more realistic fitting functions will give better estimates than trend analysis. -Graphical example -````````````````` +Graphical examples +`````````````````` + +The following pictures show the upper and lower bound (one sigma) +on estimated critical rate, as computed by PLRsearch, after each trial measurement +within the 30 minute duration of a test run. + +Both graphs are focusing on later estimates. Estimates computed from +few initial measurements are wildly off the y-axis range shown. + +L2 patch +-------- + +This test case shows quite narrow critical region. Both fitting functions +give similar estimates, the graph shows the randomness of measurements, +and a trend. Both fitting functions seem to be somewhat overestimating +the critical rate. The final estimated interval is too narrow, +a longer run would report estimates somewhat bellow the current lower bound. + +.. only:: latex + + .. raw:: latex + + \begin{figure}[H] + \centering + \graphicspath{{../_tmp/src/introduction/}} + \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{PLR_patch} + \label{fig:PLR_patch} + \end{figure} + +.. only:: html + + .. figure:: PLR_patch.svg + :alt: PLR_patch + :align: center + +Vhost +----- -The following picture shows the estimated average of the critical rate -computed by the two fitting functions after each trial measurement -within the 30 minute duration of a PLRsearch test run. +This test case shows quite broad critical region. Fitting functions give +fairly differing estimates. One overestimates, the other underestimates. +The graph mostly shows later measurements slowly bringing the estimates +towards each other. The final estimated interval is too broad, +a longer run would return a smaller interval within the current one. .. only:: latex @@ -352,14 +390,14 @@ within the 30 minute duration of a PLRsearch test run. \begin{figure}[H] \centering \graphicspath{{../_tmp/src/introduction/}} - \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{PLRsearch} - \label{fig:PLRsearch} + \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{PLR_vhost} + \label{fig:PLR_vhost} \end{figure} .. only:: html - .. figure:: PLRsearch.svg - :alt: PLRsearch + .. figure:: PLR_vhost.svg + :alt: PLR_vhost :align: center .. _plrsearch draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vpolak-bmwg-plrsearch-00 |