report 18.07: final final editorial nit picking in v0.9.

Formatting and removing excessive white space in static content.

Change-Id: I7400f4ba6386b85b59b667db026558685ec0d1a1
Signed-off-by: Maciek Konstantynowicz <mkonstan@cisco.com>

5 files changed, 15 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/docs/report/introduction/introduction.rst b/docs/report/introduction/introduction.rst
index 01108f1119..24c5970725 100644
--- a/docs/report/introduction/introduction.rst
+++ b/docs/report/introduction/introduction.rst
@@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ Introduction
 ============
 
 FD.io |csit-release| report contains system performance and functional
-testing data of |vpp-release|.
-
-`PDF version of this report`_ is also available for download.
+testing data of |vpp-release|. `PDF version of this report`_ is
+available for download.
 
 |csit-release| report is structured as follows:
 
diff --git a/docs/report/introduction/methodology.rst b/docs/report/introduction/methodology.rst
index 28bcf68257..1a1c349ba2 100644
--- a/docs/report/introduction/methodology.rst
+++ b/docs/report/introduction/methodology.rst
@@ -15,15 +15,14 @@ different Packet Loss Ratio (PLR) values.
 Following MLRsearch values are measured across a range of L2 frame sizes
 and reported:
 
-- **Non Drop Rate (NDR)**: packet and bandwidth throughput at PLR=0%.
+- NON DROP RATE (NDR): packet and bandwidth throughput at PLR=0%.
 
   - **Aggregate packet rate**: NDR_LOWER <bi-directional packet rate>
     pps.
   - **Aggregate bandwidth rate**: NDR_LOWER <bi-directional bandwidth
     rate> Gbps.
 
-- **Partial Drop Rate (PDR)**: packet and bandwidth throughput at
-  PLR=0.5%.
+- PARTIAL DROP RATE (PDR): packet and bandwidth throughput at PLR=0.5%.
 
   - **Aggregate packet rate**: PDR_LOWER <bi-directional packet rate>
     pps.
diff --git a/docs/report/introduction/physical_testbeds.rst b/docs/report/introduction/physical_testbeds.rst
index ba6cd39389..f6c559c8e8 100644
--- a/docs/report/introduction/physical_testbeds.rst
+++ b/docs/report/introduction/physical_testbeds.rst
@@ -6,9 +6,8 @@ Physical Testbeds
 All :abbr:`FD.io (Fast Data Input/Ouput)` :abbr:`CSIT (Continuous System
 Integration and Testing)` performance testing listed in this report are
 executed on physical testbeds built with bare-metal servers hosted by
-:abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` FD.io project.
-
-Two testbed topologies are used:
+:abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` FD.io project. Two testbed topologies are
+used:
 
 - **3-Node Topology**: Consisting of two servers acting as SUTs
   (Systems Under Test) and one server as TG (Traffic Generator), all
diff --git a/docs/report/introduction/test_environment_intro.rst b/docs/report/introduction/test_environment_intro.rst
index 19dac90b96..7763e9df8b 100644
--- a/docs/report/introduction/test_environment_intro.rst
+++ b/docs/report/introduction/test_environment_intro.rst
@@ -7,9 +7,8 @@ Physical Testbeds
 -----------------
 
 FD.io CSIT performance tests are executed in physical testbeds hosted by
-:abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` for FD.io project.
-
-Two physical testbed topology types are used:
+:abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` for FD.io project. Two physical testbed
+topology types are used:
 
 - **3-Node Topology**: Consisting of two servers acting as SUTs
   (Systems Under Test) and one server as TG (Traffic Generator), all
@@ -20,10 +19,8 @@ Two physical testbed topology types are used:
 Tested SUT servers are based on a range of processors including Intel
 Xeon Haswell-SP, Intel Xeon Skylake-SP, Arm, Intel Atom. More detailed
 description is provided in
-:ref:`tested_physical_topologies`.
-
-Tested logical topologies are described in
-:ref:`tested_logical_topologies`.
+:ref:`tested_physical_topologies`. Tested logical topologies are
+described in :ref:`tested_logical_topologies`.
 
 Server Specifications
 ---------------------
diff --git a/docs/report/introduction/test_scenarios_overview.rst b/docs/report/introduction/test_scenarios_overview.rst
index aebb0b1900..ccd5e820d7 100644
--- a/docs/report/introduction/test_scenarios_overview.rst
+++ b/docs/report/introduction/test_scenarios_overview.rst
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ covers baseline tests of DPDK sample applications. Tests are executed in
 physical (performance tests) and virtual environments (functional
 tests).
 
-Following list provides a brief overview of test scenarios covered in
-this report:
+Brief overview of test scenarios covered in this report:
 
 #. **VPP Performance**: VPP performance tests are executed in physical
    FD.io testbeds, focusing on VPP network data plane performance in
@@ -70,13 +69,11 @@ this report:
    client (DUT2) scenario using DMM framework and Linux kernel TCP/IP
    stack.
 
-All CSIT test results listed in this report are sourced and auto-
+All CSIT test data included in this report is auto-
 generated from :abbr:`RF (Robot Framework)` :file:`output.xml` files
-resulting from :abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` FD.io Jenkins jobs executed
-against |vpp-release| release artifacts. References are provided to the
-original FD.io Jenkins job results. Additional references are provided
-to the :abbr:`RF (Robot Framework)` result files that got archived in
-FD.io Nexus online storage system.
+produced by :abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` FD.io Jenkins jobs executed
+against |vpp-release| artifacts. References are provided to the
+original FD.io Jenkins job results and all archived source files.
 
 FD.io CSIT system is developed using two main coding platforms: :abbr:`RF (Robot
 Framework)` and Python2.7. |csit-release| source code for the executed test