Add tox.ini and few checker scripts

(cherry-pick from master, also pasted current bash code style)

The plan is to change csit-validate-pylint-master job
to fail if (and only if) tox fails.

This will allow us to easily add checks,
with or without the voting power.

Each check produces log (ignored in .gitignore)
the voting job can archive.

+ Made autogen quiet by default, to avoid spam in autogen checker.
+ Unified the way direct csit subdirectories are git-ignored.

Change-Id: I6477b1ef7da6d3e30f68c5850d04900cc52f431e
Signed-off-by: Vratko Polak <vrpolak@cisco.com>

1 files changed, 712 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/bash_code_style.rst b/docs/bash_code_style.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e5dbc9c06e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/bash_code_style.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,712 @@
+..
+   Copyright (c) 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates.
+   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+   You may obtain a copy of the License at:
+..
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+..
+   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   limitations under the License.
+
+
+The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
+"MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
+described in `BCP 14 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp14>`_
+`[RFC2119] <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119>`_
+`[RFC8174] <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174>`_
+when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
+
+This document SHALL describe guidelines for writing reliable, maintainable,
+reusable and readable code for CSIT.
+
+Motivation
+^^^^^^^^^^
+
+TODO: List reasons why we need code style document for Bash.
+
+Proposed style
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+File types
+~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Bash files SHOULD NOT be monolithic. Generally, this document
+considers two types of bash files:
+
++ Entry script: Assumed to be called by user,
+  or a script "external" in some way.
+
+  + Sources bash libraries and calls functions defined there.
+
++ Library file: To be sourced by entry scipts, possibly also by other libraries.
+
+  + Sources other libraries for functions it needs.
+
+    + Or relies on a related file already having sourced that.
+
+    + Documentation SHALL imply which case it is.
+
+  + Defines multiple functions other scripts can call.
+
+Safety
+~~~~~~
+
++ Variable expansions MUST be quoted, to prevent word splitting.
+
+  + This includes special "variables" such as "${1}".
+
+    + RECOMMENDED even if the value is safe, as in "$?" and "$#".
+
+  + It is RECOMMENDED to quote strings in general,
+    so text editors can syntax-highlight them.
+
+    + Even if the string is a numeric value.
+
+    + Commands and known options can get their own highlight, no need to quote.
+
+      + Example: You do not need to quote every word of
+        "pip install --upgrade virtualenv".
+
+  + Code SHALL NOT quote glob characters you need to expand (obviously).
+
+    + OPTIONALLY do not quote adjacent characters (such as dot or fore-slash),
+      so that syntax highlighting makes them stand out compared to surrounding
+      ordinary strings.
+
+    + Example: cp "logs"/*."log" "."/
+
+    + TODO: Consider giving examples both for good and bad usage.
+
+  + Command substitution on right hand side of assignment should be safe
+    without quotes.
+
+    + But still, quotes are RECOMMENDED, unless line length is a concern.
+
+    + Note that command substitution limits the scope for quotes,
+      so it is NOT REQUIRED to escape the quotes in deeper levels.
+
+    + TODO: Do we prefer backtics, or "dollar round-bracket"?
+
+      + Backticks are more readable, especially when there are
+        round brackets in the surrounding text.
+
+      + Backticks do not allow nested command substitution.
+
+        + But we might want to avoid nested command substitution anyway?
+
+  + Code SHOULD NOT be structured in a way where
+    word splitting is intended.
+
+    + Example: Variable holding string of multiple command lines arguments.
+
+    + Solution: Array variable should be used in this case.
+
+    + Expansion MUST use quotes then: "${name[@]}".
+
+    + Word splitting MAY be used when creating arrays from command substitution.
+
++ Code MUST always check the exit code of commands.
+
+  + Traditionally, error code checking is done either by "set -e"
+    or by appending "|| die" after each command.
+    The first is unreliable, due to many rules affecting "set -e" behavior
+    (see <https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/105>), but "|| die"
+    relies on humans identifying each command, which is also unreliable.
+    When was the last time you checked error code of "echo" command,
+    for example?
+
+    + Another example: "set -e" in your function has no effect
+      if any ancestor call is done with logical or,
+      for example in "func || code=$?" construct.
+
+  + As there is no reliable method of error detection, and there are two
+    largely independent unreliable methods, the best what we can do
+    is to apply both. So, code SHOULD explicitly
+    check each command (with "|| die" and similar) AND have "set -e" applied.
+
+  + Code MUST explicitly check each command, unless the command is well known,
+    and considered safe (such as the aforementioned "echo").
+
+    + The well known commands MUST still be checked implicitly via "set -e".
+
+  + See below for specific "set -e" recommendations.
+
++ Code SHOULD use "readlink -e" (or "-f" if target does not exist yet)
+  to normalize any path value to absolute path without symlinks.
+  It helps with debugging and identifies malformed paths.
+
++ Code SHOULD use such normalized paths for sourcing.
+
++ When exiting on a known error, code MUST print a longer, helpful message,
+  in order for the user to fix their situation if possible.
+
++ When error happens at an unexpected place, it is RECOMMENDED for the message
+  to be short and generic, instead of speculative.
+
+Bash options
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
++ Code MUST apply "-x" to make debugging easier.
+
+  + Code MAY temporarily supress such output in order to avoid spam
+    (e.g. in long busy loops), but it is still NOT RECOMMENDED to do so.
+
++ Code MUST apply "-e" for early error detection.
+
+  + But code still SHOULD use "|| die" for most commands,
+    as "-e" has numerous rules and exceptions.
+
+  + Code MAY apply "+e" temporarily for commands which (possibly nonzero)
+    exit code it interested in.
+
+    + Code MUST to store "$?" and call "set -e" immediatelly afterwards.
+
+    + Code MUST NOT use this approach when calling functions.
+
+      + That is because functions are instructed to apply "set -e" on their own
+        which (when triggered) will exit the whole entry script.
+
+        + Unless overriden by ERR trap.
+          But code SHOULD NOT set any ERR trap.
+
+      + If code needs exit code of a function, it is RECOMMENDED to use
+        pattern 'code="0"; called_function || code="${?}"'.
+
+        + In this case, contributor MUST make sure nothing in the
+          called_function sub-graph relies on "set -e" behavior,
+          because the call being part of "or construct" disables it.
+
+  + Code MAY append "|| true" for benign commands,
+    when it is clear non-zero exit codes make no difference.
+
+    + Also in this case, the contributor MUST make sure nothing within
+      the called sub-graph depends on "set -e", as it is disabled.
+
++ Code MUST apply "-u" as unset variable is generally a typo, thus an error.
+
+  + Code MAY temporarily apply "+u" if a command needs that to pass.
+
+    + Virtualenv activation is the only known example so far.
+
++ Code MUST apply "-o pipefail" to make sure "-e" picks errors
+  inside piped construct.
+
+  + Code MAY use "|| true" inside a pipe construct, in the (inprobable) case
+    when non-zero exit code still results in a meaningful pipe output.
+
++ All together: "set -exuo pipefail".
+
+  + Code MUST put that line near start of every file, so we are sure
+    the options are applied no matter what.
+
+    + "Near start" means "before any nontrivial code".
+
+    + Basically only copyright is RECOMMENDED to appear before.
+
+  + Also code MUST put the line near start of function bodies
+    and subshell invocations.
+
+Functions
+~~~~~~~~~
+
+There are (at least) two possibilities how a code from an external file
+can be executed. Either the file contains a code block to execute
+on each "source" invocation, or the file just defines functions
+which have to be called separately.
+
+This document considers the "function way" to be better,
+here are some pros and cons:
+
++ Cons:
+
+  + The function way takes more space. Files have more lines,
+    and the code in function body is one indent deeper.
+
+  + It is not easy to create functions for low-level argument manipulation,
+    as "shift" command in the function code does not affect the caller context.
+
+  + Call sites frequently refer to code two times,
+    when sourcing the definition and when executing the function.
+
+  + It is not clear when a library can rely on its relative
+    to have performed the sourcing already.
+
+  + Ideally, each library should detect if it has been sourced already
+    and return early, which takes even more space.
+
++ Pros:
+
+  + Some code blocks are more useful when used as function,
+    to make call site shorter.
+
+    + Examples: Trap functions, "die" function.
+
+  + The "import" part and "function" part usually have different side effects,
+    making the documentation more focused (even if longer overall).
+
+  + There is zero risk of argument-less invocation picking arguments
+    from parent context.
+
+    + This safety feature is the main reason for chosing the "function way".
+
+    + This allows code blocks to support optional arguments.
+
++ Rules:
+
+  + Library files MUST be only "source"d. For example if "tox" calls a script,
+    it is an entry script.
+
+  + Library files (upon sourcing) MUST minimize size effect.
+
+    + The only permitted side effects MUST by directly related to:
+
+      + Defining functions (without executing them).
+
+      + Sourcing sub-library files.
+
+  + If a bash script indirectly call another bash script,
+    it is not a "source" operation, variables are not shared,
+    so the called script MUST be considered an entry script,
+    even if it implements logic fitting into a single function.
+
+  + Entry scripts SHOULD avoid duplicating any logic.
+
+    + Clear duplicated blocks MUST be moved into libraries as functions.
+
+    + Blocks with low amount of duplication MAY remain in entry scripts.
+
+    + Usual motives for not creating functions are:
+
+      + The extracted function would have too much logic for processing
+        arguments (instead of hardcoding values as in entry script).
+
+      + The arguments needed would be too verbose.
+
+        + And using "set +x" would take too much vertical space
+          (when compared to entry script implementation).
+
+Variables
+~~~~~~~~~
+
+This document describes two kinds of variables: called "local" and "global".
+
+TODO: Find better adjectives for the two kinds defined here,
+if the usual bash meaning makes reader forget other specifics.
+For example, variable with lowercase name and not marked by "local" builtin,
+is cosidered "global" from bash point of view, but "local" from this document
+point of view.
+
++ Local variables:
+
+  + Variable name MUST contain only lower case letters, digits and underscores.
+
+  + Code MUST NOT export local variables.
+
+  + Code MUST NOT rely on local variables set in different contexts.
+
+  + Documentation is NOT REQUIRED.
+
+    + Variable name SHOULD be descriptive enough.
+
+  + Local variable MUST be initialized before first use.
+
+    + Code SHOULD have a comment if a reader might have missed
+      the initialization.
+
+  + TODO: Agree on level of defensiveness (against local values
+    being influenced by other functions) needed.
+    Possible alternatives / additions to the "always initialize" rule:
+
+    + Unset local variables when leaving the function.
+
+    + Explicitly typeset by "local" builtin command.
+
+    + Require strict naming convention, e.g. function_name__variable_name.
+
++ Global variables:
+
+  + Variable name MUST contain only upper case letters, digits and underscores.
+
+  + They SHOULD NOT be exported, unless external commands need them
+    (e.g. PYTHONPATH).
+
+  + TODO: Propose a strict naming convention, or a central document
+    of all used global variables, to prevent contributors
+    from causing variable name conflicts.
+
+  + Code MUST document if a function (or its inner call)
+    reads a global variable.
+
+  + Code MUST document if a function (or its inner call)
+    sets or rewrites a global variable.
+
+  + If a function "wants to return a value", it SHOULD be implemented
+    as the function setting (or rewriting) a global variable,
+    and the call sites reading that variable.
+
+  + If a function "wants to accept an argument", it IS RECOMMENDED
+    to be implemented as the call sites setting or rewriting global variables,
+    and the function reading that variables.
+    But see below for direct arguments.
+
++ Code MUST use curly brackets when referencing variables,
+  e.g. "${my_variable}".
+
+  + It makes related constructs (such as ${name:-default}) less surprising.
+
+  + It looks more similar to Robot Framework variables (which is good).
+
+Arguments
+~~~~~~~~~
+
+Bash scripts and functions MAY accept arguments, named "${1}", "${2}" and so on.
+As a whole available via "$@".
+You MAY use "shift" command to consume an argument.
+
+Contexts
+````````
+
+Functions never have access to parent arguments, but they can read and write
+variables set or read by parent contexts.
+
+Arguments or variables
+``````````````````````
+
++ Both arguments and global variables MAY act as an input.
+
++ In general, if the caller is likely to supply the value already placed
+  in a global variable of known name, it is RECOMMENDED
+  to use that global variable.
+
++ Construct "${NAME:-value}" can be used equally well for arguments,
+  so default values are possible for both input methods.
+
++ Arguments are positional, so there are restrictions on which input
+  is optional.
+
++ Functions SHOULD either look at arguments (possibly also
+  reading global variables to use as defaults), or look at variables only.
+
++ Code MUST NOT rely on "${0}", it SHOULD use "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" instead
+  (and apply "readlink -e") to get the current block location.
+
++ For entry scripts, it is RECOMMENDED to use standard parsing capabilities.
+
+  + For most Linux distros, "getopt" is RECOMMENDED.
+
+Working directory handling
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
++ Functions SHOULD act correctly without neither assuming
+  what the currect working directory is, nor changing it.
+
+  + That is why global variables and arguments SHOULD contain
+    (normalized) full paths.
+
+  + Motivation: Different call sites MAY rely on different working directories.
+
++ A function MAY return (also with nonzero exit code) when working directory
+  is changed.
+
+  + In this case the function documentation MUST clearly state where (and when)
+    is the working directory changed.
+
+    + Exception: Functions with undocumented exit code.
+
+    + Those functions MUST return nonzero code only on "set -e" or "die".
+
+      + Note that both "set -e" and "die" by default result in exit of the whole
+        entry script, but the caller MAY have altered that behavior
+        (by registering ERR trap, or redefining die function).
+
+    + Any callers which use "set +e" or "|| true" MUST make sure
+      their (and their caller ancestors') assumption on working directory
+      are not affected.
+
+      + Such callers SHOULD do that by restoring the original working directory
+        either in their code,
+
+      + or contributors SHOULD do such restoration in the function code,
+        (see below) if that is more convenient.
+
+  + Motivation: Callers MAY rely on this side effect to simplify their logic.
+
++ A function MAY assume a particular directory is already set
+  as the working directory (to save space).
+
+  + In this case function documentation MUST clearly state what the assumed
+    working directory is.
+
+  + Motivation: Callers MAY call several functions with common
+    directory of interest.
+
+    + Example: Several dowload actions to execute in sequence,
+      implemented as functions assuming ${DOWNLOAD_DIR}
+      is the working directory.
+
++ A function MAY change the working directory transiently,
+  before restoring it back before return.
+
+  + Such functions SHOULD use command "pushd" to change the working directory.
+
+  + Such functions SHOULD use "trap 'trap - RETURN; popd' RETURN"
+    imediately after the pushd.
+
+    + In that case, the "trap - RETURN" part MUST be included,
+      to restore any trap set by ancestor.
+
+    + Functions MAY call "trap - RETURN; popd" exlicitly.
+
+    + Such functions MUST NOT call another pushd (before an explicit popd),
+      as traps do not stack within a function.
+
++ If entry scripts also use traps to restore working directory (or other state),
+  they SHOULD use EXIT traps instead.
+
+  + That is because "exit" command, as well as the default behavior
+    of "die" or "set -e" cause direct exit (without skipping function returns).
+
+Function size
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
++ In general, code SHOULD follow reasoning similar to how pylint
+  limits code complexity.
+
++ It is RECOMMENDED to have functions somewhat simpler than Python functions,
+  as Bash is generally more verbose and less readable.
+
++ If code contains comments in order to partition a block
+  into sub-blocks, the sub-blocks SHOULD be moved into separate functions.
+
+  + Unless the sub-blocks are essentially one-liners,
+    not readable just because external commands do not have
+    obvious enough parameters. Use common sense.
+
+Documentation
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
++ The library path and filename is visible from source sites. It SHOULD be
+  descriptive enough, so reader do not need to look inside to determine
+  how and why is the sourced file used.
+
+  + If code would use several functions with similar names,
+    it is RECOMMENDED to create a (well-named) sub-library for them.
+
+  + Code MAY create deep library trees if needed, it SHOULD store
+    common path prefixes into global variables to make sourcing easier.
+
+  + Contributors, look at other files in the subdirectory. You SHOULD
+    improve their filenames when adding-removing other filenames.
+
+  + Library files SHOULD NOT have executable flag set.
+
+  + Library files SHOULD have an extension .sh (or perhaps .bash).
+
+  + It is RECOMMENDED for entry scripts to also have executable flag unset
+    and have .sh extension.
+
++ Each entry script MUST start with a shebang.
+
+  + "#!/bin/usr/env bash" is RECOMMENDED.
+
+  + Code SHOULD put an empty line after shebang.
+
+  + Library files SHOULD NOT contain a shebang, as "source" is the primary
+    method to include them.
+
++ Following that, there SHOULD be a block of comment lines with copyright.
+
+  + It is a boilerplate, but human eyes are good at ignoring it.
+
+  + Overhead for git is also negligible.
+
++ Following that, there MUST be "set -exuo pipefail".
+
+  + It acts as an anchor for humans to start paying attention.
+
+Then it depends on script type.
+
+Library documentation
+`````````````````````
+
++ Following "set -exuo pipefail" SHALL come the "import part" documentation.
+
++ Then SHALL be the import code
+  ("source" commands and a bare minimum they need).
+
++ Then SHALL be the function definitions, and inside:
+
+  + "set -exuo pipefail" again.
+
+  + Following that SHALL be the function documentation explaining API contract.
+    Similar to Robot [Documentation] or Python function-level docstring.
+
+    + See below.
+
+  + Following that SHALL be varius TODOs, FIXMEs and code itself.
+
+    + "Code itself" SHALL include comment lines
+      explaining any non-obvious logic.
+
+    + TODO: Document (in an appropriate place) how TODOs differ from FIXMEs.
+
+  + There SHALL be two empty lines before next function definition.
+
+More details on function documentation:
+
+Generally, code SHOULD use comments to explain anything
+not obvious from the funtion name.
+
++ Function documentation SHOULD start with short description of function
+  operation or motivation, but only if not obvious from function name.
+
++ Documentation SHOULD continue with listing any non-obvious side effect:
+
+  + Documentation MUST list all read global variables.
+
+    + Documentation SHOULD include descriptions of semantics
+      of global variable values.
+      It is RECOMMENDED to mention which function is supposed to set them.
+
+    + The "include descriptions" part SHOULD apply to other items as well.
+
+  + Documentation MUST list all global variables set, unset, reset,
+    or otherwise updated.
+
+  + It is RECOMMENDED to list all hardcoded values used in code.
+
+    + Not critical, but can hint at future improvements.
+
+  + Documentation MUST list all files or directories read
+    (so caller can make sure their content is ready).
+
+  + Documentation MUST list all files or directories updated
+    (created, deleted, emptied, otherwise edited).
+
+  + Documentation SHOULD list all functions called (so reader can look them up).
+
+    + Documentation SHOULD mention where are the functions defined,
+      if not in the current file.
+
+  + Documentation SHOULD list all external commands executed.
+
+    + Because their behavior can change "out of bounds", meaning
+      the contributor changing the implementation of the extrenal command
+      can be unaware of this particular function interested in its side effects.
+
+  + Documentation SHOULD explain exit code (coming from
+    the last executed command).
+
+    + Usually, most functions SHOULD be "pass or die",
+      but some callers MAY be interested in nonzero exit codes
+      without using global variables to store them.
+
+    + Remember, "exit 1" ends not only the function, but all scripts
+      in the source chain, so code MUST NOT use it for other purposes.
+
+      + Code SHOULD call "die" function instead. This way the caller can
+        redefine that function, if there is a good reason for not exiting
+        on function failure.
+
+  + TODO: Programs installed, services started, URLs downloaded from, ...
+
+  + TODO: Add more items when you spot them.
+
+  + TODO: Is the current order recommended?
+
+Entry script documentation
+``````````````````````````
+
++ After "set -exuo pipefail", high-level description SHALL come.
+
+  + Then TODOs and FIXMEs SHALL be placed (if any).
+
+  + Entry scripts are rarely reused, so detailed side effects
+    are OPTIONAL to document.
+
+  + But code SHOULD document the primary side effects.
+
++ Then SHALL come few commented lines to import the library with "die" function.
+
++ Then block of "source" commands for sourcing other libraries needed SHALL be.
+
+  + In alphabetical order, any "special" library SHOULD be
+    in the previous block (for "die").
+
++ Then block os commands processing arguments SHOULD be (if needed).
+
++ Then SHALL come block of function calls (with parameters as needed).
+
+Other general recommendations
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
++ Code SHOULD NOT not repeat itself, even in documentation:
+
+  + For hardcoded values, a general description SHOULD be written
+    (instead of copying the value), so when someone edits the value
+    in the code, the description still applies.
+
+  + If affected directory name is taken from a global variable,
+    documentation MAY distribute the directory description
+    over the two items.
+
+  + If most of side effects come from an inner call,
+    documentation MAY point the reader to the documentation
+    of the called function (instead of listing all the side effects).
+
+    + TODO: Composite functions can have large effects. Should we require
+      intermediate functions to actively hide them whenever possible?
+
++ But documentation SHOULD repeat it if the information crosses functions.
+
+  + Item description MUST NOT be skipped just because the reader
+    should have read parent/child documentation already.
+
+  + Frequently it is RECOMMENDED to copy&paste item descriptions
+    between functions.
+
+  + But sometimes it is RECOMMENDED to vary the descriptions. For example:
+
+    + A global variable setter MAY document how does it figure out the value
+      (without caring about what it will be used for by other functions).
+
+    + A global variable reader MAY document how does it use the value
+      (without caring about how has it been figured out by the setter).
+
++ When possible, Bash code SHOULD be made to look like Python
+  (or Robot Framework). Those are three primary languages CSIT code relies on,
+  so it is nicer for the readers to see similar expressions when possible.
+  Examples:
+
+  + Code MUST use indentation, 1 level is 4 spaces.
+
+  + Code SHOULD use "if" instead of "&&" constructs.
+
+  + For comparisons, code SHOULD use operators such as "!=" (needs "[[").
+
++ Code MUST NOT use more than 80 characters per line.
+
+  + If long external command invocations are needed,
+    code SHOULD use array variables to shorten them.
+
+  + If long strings (or arrays) are needed, code SHOULD use "+=" operator
+    to grow the value over multiple lines.
+
+  + If "|| die" does not fit with the command, code SHOULD use curly braces:
+
+    + Current line has "|| {",
+
+    + Next line has the die commands (indented one level deeper),
+
+    + Final line closes with "}" at original intent level.
+
+  + TODO: Recommend what to do with other constructs.
+
+    + For example multiple piped commands.
+
+    + No, "eval" is too unsafe to use.