aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/vpp/perf/ip4/10ge2p1x710-ethip4udp-ip4base-iacl50sl-100kflows-ndrpdr.robot
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVratko Polak <vrpolak@cisco.com>2024-05-20 17:01:11 +0200
committerVratko Polak <vrpolak@cisco.com>2024-05-20 17:01:11 +0200
commit55bdf4cc0046617100676685d1f5ef075167af1d (patch)
treeffefa62b316881619047bba77ebf5e5e54d8ac86 /tests/vpp/perf/ip4/10ge2p1x710-ethip4udp-ip4base-iacl50sl-100kflows-ndrpdr.robot
parentc5d1ec293164a5aad9b04a7df749b85c2ef01582 (diff)
fix(perf): Increase threshold for jumbo
The old limit of 1522 was introduced long time ago. First, it appeared here [0], where it is correct as that suite has zero overhead. The first suite with wrong logic seems to be here [1] (no "Add No Multi Seg to all DUTs" in 1518B testcase). And when I was moving that logic to a keyword in [2], I did not realize it is wrong with overhead. This Change uses 1800 as the new threshold, matching the value used for non-jumbo MTU. [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/2652/12/tests/perf/Bridge_Domain_Intel-X520-DA2.robot#70 [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/4454/96/tests/perf/40ge2p1xl710-ethip4ipsecscaleip4-ip4base-interfaces-aes-gcm-ndrpdrdisc.robot#229 [2] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/13411/35/resources/libraries/robot/performance/performance_utils.robot#84 Change-Id: Iff3703fcff0e4bbb1a6b10be359fa5ef67fd5422 Signed-off-by: Vratko Polak <vrpolak@cisco.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/vpp/perf/ip4/10ge2p1x710-ethip4udp-ip4base-iacl50sl-100kflows-ndrpdr.robot')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions