1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
Overview
========
Tested Virtual Topologies
-------------------------
CSIT VPP functional tests are executed on virtualized topologies created using
Virtual Internet Routing Lab (VIRL) simulation platform contributed by Cisco.
VIRL runs on physical baremetal servers hosted by LF FD.io project. Majority
of the tests are executed in the three node logical test topology - Traffic
Generator (TG) node and two Systems Under Test (SUT) nodes connected in a
loop. Some tests use two node logical test topology - TG node and SUT1 node.
Both logical test topologies are shown in the figures below.
::
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
| | | |
| +------------------+ | | +------------------+ |
| | <-----------------> | |
| | | | | | | |
| | DUT1 <-----------------> DUT2 | |
| +--^--^------------+ | | +------------^--^--+ |
| | | | | | | |
| | | SUT1 | | SUT2 | | |
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
| | | |
| | | |
| | +-----------+ | |
| +---------------> <---------------+ |
| | TG | |
+------------------> <------------------+
+-----------+
+------------------------+
| |
| +------------------+ |
+---------------> <--------------+
| | | | | |
| |------------> DUT1 <-----------+ |
| | | +--^--^------------+ | | |
| | | | | |
| | | SUT1 | | |
| | +------------------------+ | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | +-----------+ | |
| +---------------> <---------------+ |
| | TG | |
+------------------> <------------------+
+-----------+
SUT1 and SUT2 are two VMs (Ubuntu or Centos, depending on the test suite), TG
is a Traffic Generator (TG, another Ubuntu VM). SUTs run VPP SW application in
Linux user-mode as a Device Under Test (DUT) within the VM. TG runs Scapy SW
application as a packet Traffic Generator. Logical connectivity between SUTs
and to TG is provided using virtual NICs using VMs' virtio driver.
Virtual testbeds are created on-demand whenever a verification job is started
(e.g. triggered by the gerrit patch submission) and destroyed upon completion
of all functional tests. Each node is a Virtual Machine and each connection
that is drawn on the diagram is available for use in any test case. During the
test execution, all nodes are reachable thru the Management network connected
to every node via dedicated virtual NICs and virtual links (not shown above
for clarity).
For the test cases that require DUT (VPP) to communicate with VM over the
vhost-user interfaces, a nested VM is created on SUT1 and/or SUT2 for the
duration of these particular test cases only. DUT (VPP) test topology with VM
is shown in the figure below including the applicable packet flow thru the VM
(marked in the figure with ``***``).
::
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
| +----------+ | | +----------+ |
| | VM | | | | VM | |
| | ****** | | | | ****** | |
| +--^----^--+ | | +--^----^--+ |
| *| |* | | *| |* |
| +------v----v------+ | | +------v----v------+ |
| | * * |**|***********|**| * * | |
| | ***** *******<----------------->******* ***** | |
| | * DUT1 | | | | DUT2 * | |
| +--^---------------+ | | +---------------^--+ |
| *| | | |* |
| *| SUT1 | | SUT2 |* |
+------------------------+ +------------------^-----+
*| |*
*| |*
*| +-----------+ |*
*| | | |*
*+------------------> TG <------------------+*
******************* | |********************
+-----------+
Functional Tests Coverage
-------------------------
Following VPP functional test areas are covered in the CSIT |release| with
results listed in this report:
- **DHCP - Client and Proxy** - Dynamic Host Control Protocol Client and Proxy
for IPv4, IPv6.
- **GRE Overlay Tunnels** - Generic Routing Encapsulation for IPv4.
- **L2BD Ethernet Switching** - L2 Bridge-Domain switched-forwarding for
untagged Ethernet, dot1q and dot1ad tagged.
- **L2XC Ethernet Switching** - L2 Cross-Connect switched-forwarding for
untagged Ethernet, dot1q and dot1ad tagged.
- **LISP Overlay Tunnels** - Locator/ID Separation Protocol overlay tunnels and
locator/id mapping control.
- **Softwire Tunnels** - IPv4-in-IPv6 softwire tunnels.
- **Cop Address Security** - address white-list and black-list filtering for
IPv4, IPv6.
- **IPSec - Tunnels and Transport** - IPSec tunnel and transport modes.
- **IPv6 Routed-Forwarding** - IPv6 routed-forwarding, NS/ND, RA, ICMPv6.
- **uRPF Source Security** - unicast Reverse Path Forwarding security.
- **Tap Interface** - baseline Linux tap interface tests.
- **Telemetry - IPFIX and SPAN** - IPFIX netflow statistics and SPAN port
mirroring.
- **VRF Routed-Forwarding** - multi-context IPVPN routed-forwarding for IPv4,
IPv6.
- **iACL Security** - ingress Access Control List security for IPv4, IPv6, MAC.
- **IPv4 Routed-Forwarding** - IPv4 routed-forwarding, RPF, ARP, Proxy ARP,
ICMPv4.
- **QoS Policer Metering** - ingress packet rate measuring and marking for IPv4,
IPv6.
- **VLAN Tag Translation** - L2 VLAN tag translation 2to2, 2to1, 1to2, 1to1.
- **VXLAN Overlay Tunnels** - VXLAN tunneling for L2-over-IP, for IPv4, IPv6.
Functional Tests Naming
-----------------------
CSIT |release| introduced a common structured naming convention for all
performance and functional tests. This change was driven by substantially
growing number and type of CSIT test cases. Firstly, the original practice did
not always follow any strict naming convention. Secondly test names did not
always clearly capture tested packet encapsulations, and the actual type or
content of the tests. Thirdly HW configurations in terms of NICs, ports and
their locality were not captured either. These were but few reasons that drove
the decision to change and define a new more complete and stricter test naming
convention, and to apply this to all existing and new test cases.
The new naming should be intuitive for majority of the tests. The complete
description of CSIT test naming convention is provided on `CSIT test naming
page <https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/csit-test-naming>`_.
Here few illustrative examples of the new naming usage for functional test
suites:
#. **Physical port to physical port - a.k.a. NIC-to-NIC, Phy-to-Phy, P2P**
- *eth2p-ethip4-ip4base-func.robot* => 2 ports of Ethernet, IPv4 baseline
routed forwarding, functional tests.
#. **Physical port to VM (or VM chain) to physical port - a.k.a. NIC2VM2NIC,
P2V2P, NIC2VMchain2NIC, P2V2V2P**
- *eth2p-ethip4vxlan-l2bdbasemaclrn-eth-2vhost-1vm-func.robot* => 2 ports of
Ethernet, IPv4 VXLAN Ethernet, L2 bridge-domain switching to/from two vhost
interfaces and one VM, functional tests.
|
