1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
|
package matchers
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/onsi/gomega/format"
"github.com/onsi/gomega/internal/oraclematcher"
"github.com/onsi/gomega/types"
)
type OrMatcher struct {
Matchers []types.GomegaMatcher
// state
firstSuccessfulMatcher types.GomegaMatcher
}
func (m *OrMatcher) Match(actual interface{}) (success bool, err error) {
m.firstSuccessfulMatcher = nil
for _, matcher := range m.Matchers {
success, err := matcher.Match(actual)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if success {
m.firstSuccessfulMatcher = matcher
return true, nil
}
}
return false, nil
}
func (m *OrMatcher) FailureMessage(actual interface{}) (message string) {
// not the most beautiful list of matchers, but not bad either...
return format.Message(actual, fmt.Sprintf("To satisfy at least one of these matchers: %s", m.Matchers))
}
func (m *OrMatcher) NegatedFailureMessage(actual interface{}) (message string) {
return m.firstSuccessfulMatcher.NegatedFailureMessage(actual)
}
func (m *OrMatcher) MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(actual interface{}) bool {
/*
Example with 3 matchers: A, B, C
Match evaluates them: F, T, <?> => T
So match is currently T, what should MatchMayChangeInTheFuture() return?
Seems like it only depends on B, since currently B MUST change to allow the result to become F
Match eval: F, F, F => F
So match is currently F, what should MatchMayChangeInTheFuture() return?
Seems to depend on ANY of them being able to change to T.
*/
if m.firstSuccessfulMatcher != nil {
// one of the matchers succeeded.. it must be able to change in order to affect the result
return oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(m.firstSuccessfulMatcher, actual)
} else {
// so all matchers failed.. Any one of them changing would change the result.
for _, matcher := range m.Matchers {
if oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(matcher, actual) {
return true
}
}
return false // none of were going to change
}
}
|
