docs: cleanup typos on readthrough

Type: style

Change-Id: I3b15035ea6c13cd1ca3cdc9dfa9b10a6e1be9880
Signed-off-by: Paul Vinciguerra <pvinci@vinciconsulting.com>

4 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/dataplane.rst b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/dataplane.rst
index 256165f4f8c..daf2124158d 100644
--- a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/dataplane.rst
+++ b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/dataplane.rst
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ This section identifies different components of packet processing and describes
 
   * Wide support for standard Operating System Interfaces such as AF_Packet, Tun/Tap & Netmap.
 
-* Wide network and cryptograhic hardware support with `DPDK <https://www.dpdk.org/>`_.
+* Wide network and cryptographic hardware support with `DPDK <https://www.dpdk.org/>`_.
 * Container and Virtualization support
 
-  * Para-virtualized intefaces; Vhost and Virtio 
+  * Para-virtualized interfaces; Vhost and Virtio
   * Network Adapters over PCI passthrough
   * Native container interfaces; MemIF
   
diff --git a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/developer.rst b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/developer.rst
index 57000d45880..040762b01ba 100644
--- a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/developer.rst
+++ b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/developer.rst
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ This section describes the different ways VPP is friendly to developers:
 
   * Runs as a standard user-space process for fault tolerance, software crashes seldom require more than a process restart. 
   * Improved fault-tolerance and upgradability when compared to running similar packet processing in the kernel, software updates never require system reboots. 
-  * Development expierence is easier compared to similar kernel code 
+  * Development experience is easier compared to similar kernel code
   * Hardware isolation and protection (`iommu <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input%E2%80%93output_memory_management_unit>`_)
 
 * Built for security
diff --git a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/extensible.rst b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/extensible.rst
index c271dad7d14..e7762d71312 100644
--- a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/extensible.rst
+++ b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/extensible.rst
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Extensible and Modular Design
 
 The FD.io VPP packet processing pipeline is decomposed into a ‘packet processing
 graph’.  This modular approach means that anyone can ‘plugin’ new graph
-nodes. This makes VPP easily exensible and means that plugins can be
+nodes. This makes VPP easily extensible and means that plugins can be
 customized for specific purposes. VPP is also configurable through it's
 Low-Level API.
 
diff --git a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/what-is-vector-packet-processing.rst b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/what-is-vector-packet-processing.rst
index 994318e81c5..50a5bab8af1 100644
--- a/docs/overview/whatisvpp/what-is-vector-packet-processing.rst
+++ b/docs/overview/whatisvpp/what-is-vector-packet-processing.rst
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Vector packet processing is a common approach among high performance `Userspace
 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_space>`_ packet processing applications such
 as developed with FD.io VPP and `DPDK
 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Plane_Development_Kit>`_. The scalar based
-aproach tends to be favoured by Operating System `Kernel
+approach tends to be favoured by Operating System `Kernel
 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(operating_system)>`_ Network Stacks and
 Userspace stacks that don't have strict performance requirements.
 
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Userspace stacks that don't have strict performance requirements.
 
 A scalar packet processing network stack typically processes one packet at a
 time: an interrupt handling function takes a single packet from a Network
-Inteface, and processes it through a set of functions: fooA calls fooB calls
+Interface, and processes it through a set of functions: fooA calls fooB calls
 fooC and so on.
 
 .. code-block:: none 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ fooC and so on.
    +---> fooA(packet3) +---> fooB(packet3) +---> fooC(packet3)
 
 
-Scalar packet processing is simple, but inefficent in these ways:
+Scalar packet processing is simple, but inefficient in these ways:
 
 * When the code path length exceeds the size of the Microprocessor's instruction
   cache (I-cache), `thrashing
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Scalar packet processing is simple, but inefficent in these ways:
 
 In contrast, a vector packet processing network stack processes multiple packets
 at a time, called 'vectors of packets' or simply a 'vector'. An interrupt
-handling function takes the vector of packets from a Network Inteface, and
+handling function takes the vector of packets from a Network Interface, and
 processes the vector through a set of functions: fooA calls fooB calls fooC and
 so on.
 
@@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ so on.
 
 This approach fixes: 
 
-* The I-cache thrashing problem described above, by ammoritizing the cost of
+* The I-cache thrashing problem described above, by amortizing the cost of
   I-cache loads across multiple packets.
 
-* The ineffeciences associated with the deep call stack by recieving vectors
+* The inefficiencies associated with the deep call stack by receiving vectors
   of up to 256 packets at a time from the Network Interface, and processes them
   using a directed graph of node. The graph scheduler invokes one node dispatch
   function at a time, restricting stack depth to a few stack frames.