diff options
author | Maxime Peim <mpeim@cisco.com> | 2022-11-17 15:29:10 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dave Wallace <dwallacelf@gmail.com> | 2022-11-22 19:21:25 +0000 |
commit | ed5f291a2283dd2882a39a3019e82fd325079631 (patch) | |
tree | e8ce460cc191a921fe442dff0206a53f997ab2f2 /src/vnet/policer/policer.rst | |
parent | 9a8d12d9b317379cfff56fd415a5f7a13bb58453 (diff) |
policer: adding documentation
Type: docs
Several kinds of policers are implemented in VPP.
However, they could differ from the RFCs it is
said they are from.
Additionally, the CLI command's help has been
updated with the current list of acceptable
parameters.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Peim <mpeim@cisco.com>
Change-Id: Ic9bf94e1094bea0fcc87ccaa882c2c5f88824041
Diffstat (limited to 'src/vnet/policer/policer.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | src/vnet/policer/policer.rst | 217 |
1 files changed, 217 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/vnet/policer/policer.rst b/src/vnet/policer/policer.rst new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e7369e373b --- /dev/null +++ b/src/vnet/policer/policer.rst @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ +.. _policer: + +Policing +======== + +VPP implements several policer types, that don't always conform +to the related RFCs [#rfc2697]_ [#rfc2698]_ [#rfc4115]_. +Only policers implemented in VPP will be presented, along with +the differences they have compared to RFCs. + +.. contents:: :local: + :depth: 1 + + +1 rate 2 color (1r2c) +--------------------- + +This is the most straightforward policer. There is no RFC describing it, +however we can found its description in many documentation [#juniper]_ [#cisco]_ . + +A 1r2c policer is great to classify incoming packets into two categories: +conforming packets (said green), and violating ones (said red). + +Parameters +~~~~~~~~~~ + +To set-up such a policer, only two parameters are needed: + +Committed Information Rate (CIR) + Given in bytes per second, this parameter is the average + throughput allowed by the policer. + + It sets the limit between conforming arriving packets (those making the + traffic fall below the CIR), and violating arriving packets + (those making the traffic exceed the CIR). + +Committed Burst Size (CBS) + It represents the size (in bytes) of a token bucket used to allow + some burstiness from the incoming traffic. + +.. figure:: /_images/policer-1r2c-bucket.png + :align: center + :scale: 25% + + Figure 1: 1r2c bucket filling logic + +The committed token bucket (C) is filling up at CIR tokens (bytes) +per second, up to CBS tokens. All overflowing tokens are lost. + +Color-Blind algorithm +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. image:: /_images/policer-1r2c-blind.png + :align: center + :scale: 75% + +| + +Color-Aware algorithm +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +In online documentation, there is no trace of a color-aware 1r2c policer. +However, VPP implementation allows such a thing. + +.. image:: /_images/policer-1r2c-aware.png + :align: center + :scale: 75% + +| + + +1 rate 3 color (1r3c) RFC 2697 [#rfc2697]_ +------------------------------------------ + +As for the `1 rate 2 color (1r2c)`_ policer, only one rate parameters is required +to setup a 1r3c policer. However, such a policer adds another kind of packet category: +exceeding ones (said yellow). + +Parameters +~~~~~~~~~~ + +To set-up such a policer, three parameters are needed: + +Committed Information Rate (CIR) + As in the `1 rate 2 color (1r2c)`_ policer. + +Committed Burst Size (CBS) + As in the `1 rate 2 color (1r2c)`_ policer. + +Excess Burst Size (EBS) + It represents the size (in bytes) of a second token bucket used + to allow an additional burstiness from the incoming traffic, when + traffic as been below the CIR for some time. + +.. figure:: /_images/policer-1r3c-bucket.png + :align: center + :scale: 25% + + Figure 2: 1r3c buckets filling logic + +The committed token bucket (C) is filling up at CIR tokens (bytes) +per second, up to CBS tokens. When C is full, tokens are overflowing +into the excess token bucket (E), up to EBS tokens. Only overflowing +tokens from E are lost. + +Color-Blind algorithm +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. image:: /_images/policer-1r3c-blind.png + :align: center + :scale: 75% + +| + +Color-Aware algorithm +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. image:: /_images/policer-1r3c-aware.png + :align: center + :scale: 75% + +| + +Notes +~~~~~ + +In the RFC 2697 [#rfc2697]_ describing the 1r3c policer, conforming (green) packets +only consume tokens from the token bucket C. Whereas, in VPP, they also consume tokens from E. + +One way to stick to the RFC is then to set the EBS parameter to be superior to CBS, so that +EBS - CBS corresponds to the EBS from the RFC. + +However, VPP does not enforce setting EBS > CBS, which could result in undesired behavior. + +2 rate 3 color (2r3c) RFC 2698 [#rfc2698]_ +------------------------------------------ + +Instead of setting the limit between yellow and red packets in terms of bursts, +as it is done by `1 rate 3 color (1r3c) RFC 2697`_ policers, two rate policers introduce +another rate parameter to discriminate between those two kinds of packets. + +Parameters +~~~~~~~~~~ + +To set-up such a policer, four parameters are needed: + +Committed Information Rate (CIR) + As in the `1 rate 2 color (1r2c)`_ policer. + +Committed Burst Size (CBS) + As in the `1 rate 2 color (1r2c)`_ policer. + +Peak Information Rate (PIR) + Given in bytes per second, this parameter is the average + throughput allowed by the policer when there is a peak in + traffic. + + It sets a second limit between exceeding arriving packets + (those making the traffic fall below the PIR, but above CIR), + and violating arriving packets (those making the traffic exceed the PIR). + +Peak Burst Size (PBS) + It represents the size (in bytes) of a second token bucket used + to allow an additional peak traffic. + +.. figure:: /_images/policer-2r3c-bucket.png + :align: center + :scale: 25% + + Figure 2: 2r3c-rfc2698 buckets filling logic + +The committed token bucket (C) is filling up at CIR tokens (bytes) +per second, up to CBS tokens. In the meantime, the peak token bucket (P) +is filling up at PIR tokens per second, up to PBS. All overflowing tokens +from C and P are lost. + +Color-Blind algorithm +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. image:: /_images/policer-2r3c-blind.png + :align: center + :scale: 75% + +| + +Color-Aware algorithm +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. image:: /_images/policer-2r3c-aware.png + :align: center + :scale: 50% + +| + +Notes +~~~~~ + +To have a working policer, the condition PIR >= CIR needs to hold. +Indeed, since we assume that peak traffic should have a greater +rate than committed ones. + + +2 rate 3 color (2r3c) RFC 4115 [#rfc4115]_ +------------------------------------------ + +The 2r3c-RFC4115 is an allowed choice by VPP. However, there is currently +no implementation of such a policer. Hence, the only two rate policer VPP +implements is the `2 rate 3 color (2r3c) RFC 2698`_ policer. + + +.. rubric:: References: + +.. [#juniper] https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/traffic-mgmt-nfx/routing-policy/topics/concept/tcm-overview-cos-qfx-series-understanding.html +.. [#cisco] https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-16-8/qos-mqc-xe-16-8-book/qos-pkt-policing.html +.. [#rfc2697] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2697.html +.. [#rfc2698] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2698.html +.. [#rfc4115] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4115.html |