diff options
| author |   Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net> | 2016-10-18 15:25:35 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Damjan Marion <dmarion.lists@gmail.com> | 2016-10-21 20:16:40 +0000 |
| commit | 670909eb6eea7c0d0c0e8d674771db23bb018f4a (patch) | |
| tree | 47c421c0ee1162222ecd65f310e726a36dcf0bd0 /vlib | |
| parent | 7b0196b8262a7a441024514976fcc29980f3fe6c (diff) | |
Quad-loop ip4_lookup_inline, add _x4 validate buffer enqueue
Change-Id: I80a25fa90d8a65db619b8697cede2b98bed37cea
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'vlib')
| -rw-r--r-- | vlib/vlib/buffer_node.h | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vlib/vlib/buffer_node.h b/vlib/vlib/buffer_node.h index f98a5408b03..0cf5f86beea 100644 --- a/vlib/vlib/buffer_node.h +++ b/vlib/vlib/buffer_node.h @@ -107,6 +107,92 @@ do { \ } \ } while (0) + +/** \brief Finish enqueueing four buffers forward in the graph. + Standard quad loop boilerplate element. This is a MACRO, + with MULTIPLE SIDE EFFECTS. In the ideal case, + <code>next_index == next0 == next1 == next2 == next3</code>, + which means that the speculative enqueue at the top of the quad loop + has correctly dealt with all four packets. In that case, the macro does + nothing at all. + + @param vm vlib_main_t pointer, varies by thread + @param node current node vlib_node_runtime_t pointer + @param next_index speculated next index used for both packets + @param to_next speculated vector pointer used for both packets + @param n_left_to_next number of slots left in speculated vector + @param bi0 first buffer index + @param bi1 second buffer index + @param bi2 third buffer index + @param bi3 fourth buffer index + @param next0 actual next index to be used for the first packet + @param next1 actual next index to be used for the second packet + @param next2 actual next index to be used for the third packet + @param next3 actual next index to be used for the fourth packet + + @return @c next_index -- speculative next index to be used for future packets + @return @c to_next -- speculative frame to be used for future packets + @return @c n_left_to_next -- number of slots left in speculative frame +*/ + +#define vlib_validate_buffer_enqueue_x4(vm,node,next_index,to_next,n_left_to_next,bi0,bi1,bi2,bi3,next0,next1,next2,next3) \ +do { \ + /* After the fact: check the [speculative] enqueue to "next" */ \ + u32 fix_speculation = next_index != next0 || next_index != next1 \ + || next_index != next2 || next_index != next3; \ + if (PREDICT_FALSE(fix_speculation)) \ + { \ + /* rewind... */ \ + to_next -= 4; \ + n_left_to_next += 4; \ + \ + /* If pi0 belongs to "next", send it there */ \ + if (next_index == next0) \ + { \ + to_next[0] = pi0; \ + to_next++; \ + n_left_to_next --; \ + } \ + else /* send it where it needs to go */ \ + vlib_set_next_frame_buffer (vm, node, next0, pi0); \ + \ + if (next_index == next1) \ + { \ + to_next[0] = pi1; \ + to_next++; \ + n_left_to_next --; \ + } \ + else \ + vlib_set_next_frame_buffer (vm, node, next1, pi1); \ + \ + if (next_index == next2) \ + { \ + to_next[0] = pi2; \ + to_next++; \ + n_left_to_next --; \ + } \ + else \ + vlib_set_next_frame_buffer (vm, node, next2, pi2); \ + \ + if (next_index == next3) \ + { \ + to_next[0] = pi3; \ + to_next++; \ + n_left_to_next --; \ + } \ + else \ + vlib_set_next_frame_buffer (vm, node, next3, pi3); \ + \ + /* Change speculation: last 2 packets went to the same node */ \ + if (next2 == next3) \ + { \ + vlib_put_next_frame (vm, node, next_index, n_left_to_next); \ + next_index = next3; \ + vlib_get_next_frame (vm, node, next_index, to_next, n_left_to_next); \ + } \ + } \ + } while(0); + /** \brief Finish enqueueing one buffer forward in the graph. Standard single loop boilerplate element. This is a MACRO, with MULTIPLE SIDE EFFECTS. In the ideal case, |