Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Change-Id: I45a166b5780675d2bc6fe90595f413725704eaa8
Signed-off-by: khemendra kumar <khemendra.kumar13@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix dhcp_client_for_us() function to utilize rpc_call_main_thread
to call vlib_process_signal_event() to ensure proper handling
irrespective of it being called in main thread or worker thread.
Added ASSERT to vlib_process_sinal.. path to make sure it is called
in main thread.
Change-Id: I4109cc049d8e4225d896ce492ce201011dc9c911
Signed-off-by: John Lo <loj@cisco.com>
|
|
[support for VPWS/VPLS]
- switch to using dpo_proto_t rather than fib_protocol_t in fib_paths so that we can describe L2 paths
- VLIB nodes to handle pop/push of MPLS labels to L2
Change-Id: Id050d06a11fd2c9c1c81ce5a0654e6c5ae6afa6e
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
despite VPP DHCP client setting neither ciaddr nor giaddr and setting the broadcast bit (see RFC 2131 section 4.1) some DHCP servers will still send a unicast DCHPACK. So as not to drop this VPP must have both 1) a receive FIB entry for the OFFERED IP adress and 2) a 'don't drop me because of uRPF' FIB entry for the DHCP server's address.
Change-Id: I167d858deb45629318cbdccf5bf67d971730a42f
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
the existing seeting of client_id to a VPP version number was unused and so overridden
Change-Id: If9ebea936336f1fcca8d07e67186c95f8f8f0ccd
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I63c59e3c13859b51999d283774f7783ef0a6a5ed
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I4a529dfab5d0ce6b0bbc0ccbbd89c6b109dbf917
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
tests). The DPO was incorrectly initialised with FIB_PROTO_MAX
Change-Id: I962df9e162e4dfb6837a5ce79ea795d5ff2d7315
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Multiple DHCP (4 and/or 6) servers can be added and removed through multiple calls to the 'set dhcp server' API.
All 4/6/ discover/solicit messages will then be replicated to all servers in the list. The expectation is that the servers/system is configured in such a way that this is viable.
If VSS information is providied for the clinet VRF which also has multiple servers configured, then the same VSS information is sent to each server. Likewise the source address of packets sent to from VPP to each server is the same.
Change-Id: I3287cb084c84b3f612b78bc69cfcb5b9c1f8934d
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
The DHCP proxy and VSS information maintained by VPP is the same for v4 and v6, so we can manage this state using the same code.
Packet handling is cleary different, so this is kept separate.
Change-Id: I10f10cc1f7f19debcd4c4b099c6de64e56bb0c69
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
DHCP additions:
1) DHCPv4 will only relay a message back to the client, if the Option82 information is present. So make this the default.
2) It is no longer possible to select via the API to "insert circuit ID" - since this is now default
3) Remove the version 2 API since it's now the same as version 1.
4) Adding the VSS option is now conditional only on the presence of VSS config (not the 'insert' option in the set API)
5) DHCP proxy dump via API
Change-Id: Ia7271ba8c1d4dbf34a02c401d268ccfbb1b74f17
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7b51f88292e057c6443b12224486f2d0c9f8ae23
Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com>
|