Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Change-Id: I36ad1ef2a53af3d3f3a6348bc189b17e9e4e21bd
Signed-off-by: jackiechen1985 <xiaobo.chen@tieto.com>
|
|
- use types on the DHCP API so that the same data is sent in comfing messages and in dumps
- add the DHCP client dump API
- update VOM to refelct API changes
- rename VOM class dhcp_config* dhcp_client*
- the VOM dhcp_client class maintains the lease data (which it reads on a dump) for clients to read
Change-Id: I2a43463937cbd80c01d45798e74b21288d8b8ead
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <neale.ranns@cisco.com>
|
|
the ip4-dhcp-client-detect feature MUST run prior to nat44-out2in, or
inbound dhcp broadcast packets will be dropped. Certain dhcp servers
answer lease renewal dhcp-request packets with broadcast dhcp-acks, leading
to unrecoverable lease loss.
In detail, this constraint:
VNET_FEATURE_INIT (ip4_snat_out2in, static) = {
.arc_name = "ip4-unicast",
.node_name = "nat44-out2in",
.runs_after = VNET_FEATURES ("acl-plugin-in-ip4-fa"),
};
doesn't get the job done:
ip4-unicast:
[17] nat44-out2in
[23] ip4-dhcp-client-detect
[26] ip4-not-enabled
Add a proper constraint:
VNET_FEATURE_INIT (ip4_snat_out2in, static) = {
.arc_name = "ip4-unicast",
.node_name = "nat44-out2in",
.runs_after = VNET_FEATURES ("acl-plugin-in-ip4-fa",
"ip4-dhcp-client-detect"),
};
and the interface feature order is OK, at least in this regard:
ip4-unicast:
[17] ip4-dhcp-client-detect
[18] nat44-out2in
[26] ip4-not-enabled
We need to carefully audit (especially) the ip4-unicast feature arc,
which has [gasp] 37 features on it!
Change-Id: I5e749ead7ab2a25d80839a331de6261e112977ad
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
|
|
Add a few dhcp client rx packet/state counters
Temporarily disable the dhcp client unit test, since it trips over the
newly-added hardware address check.
Change-Id: I7f68607e6ed3d738cba357c3fe76664a99b71cd8
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
|
|
DISCOVER message sent.
According to RFC2131:
In the case of a client using DHCP for initial configuration (before
the client's TCP/IP software has been completely configured), DHCP
requires creative use of the client's TCP/IP software and liberal
interpretation of RFC 1122. The TCP/IP software SHOULD accept and
forward to the IP layer any IP packets delivered to the client's
hardware address before the IP address is configured; DHCP servers
and BOOTP relay agents may not be able to deliver DHCP messages to
clients that cannot accept hardware unicast datagrams before the
TCP/IP software is configured.
To work around some clients that cannot accept IP unicast datagrams
before the TCP/IP software is configured as discussed in the previous
paragraph, DHCP uses the 'flags' field [21]. The leftmost bit is
defined as the BROADCAST (B) flag. The semantics of this flag are
discussed in section 4.1 of this document. The remaining bits of the
flags field are reserved for future use. They MUST be set to zero by
clients and ignored by servers and relay agents. Figure 2 gives the
format of the 'flags' field.
this changes means VPP conforms to the:
"SHOULD accept and forward to the IP layer any IP packets delivered
to the client's hardware address before the IP address is configured"
with the caveat that VPP allows DHCP packets destined to the stanard client
DHCP port to be delivered. With this enhancement the control-plane is now
able to choose the setting of the broadcast flag.
Change-Id: Ia4eb2c9bb1e30c29f9192facc645e9533641955a
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I45a166b5780675d2bc6fe90595f413725704eaa8
Signed-off-by: khemendra kumar <khemendra.kumar13@gmail.com>
|
|
- Global variables declared in header files without
the use of the 'extern' keword will result in multiple
instances of the variable to be created by the compiler
-- one for each different source file in which the
the header file is included. This results in wasted
memory allocated in the BSS segments as well as
potentially introducing bugs in the application.
Change-Id: I6ef1790b60a0bd9dd3994f8510723decf258b0cc
Signed-off-by: Dave Wallace <dwallacelf@gmail.com>
|
|
the existing seeting of client_id to a VPP version number was unused and so overridden
Change-Id: If9ebea936336f1fcca8d07e67186c95f8f8f0ccd
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
The DHCP proxy and VSS information maintained by VPP is the same for v4 and v6, so we can manage this state using the same code.
Packet handling is cleary different, so this is kept separate.
Change-Id: I10f10cc1f7f19debcd4c4b099c6de64e56bb0c69
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
DHCP additions:
1) DHCPv4 will only relay a message back to the client, if the Option82 information is present. So make this the default.
2) It is no longer possible to select via the API to "insert circuit ID" - since this is now default
3) Remove the version 2 API since it's now the same as version 1.
4) Adding the VSS option is now conditional only on the presence of VSS config (not the 'insert' option in the set API)
5) DHCP proxy dump via API
Change-Id: Ia7271ba8c1d4dbf34a02c401d268ccfbb1b74f17
Signed-off-by: Neale Ranns <nranns@cisco.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7b51f88292e057c6443b12224486f2d0c9f8ae23
Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com>
|