aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTibor Frank <tifrank@cisco.com>2023-05-03 13:53:27 +0000
committerTibor Frank <tifrank@cisco.com>2023-05-09 05:56:22 +0000
commit374954b9d648f503f6783325a1266457953a998d (patch)
tree5514dee6af2a2e069189efe39d4e929dd25721f7 /docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md
parent46eac7bb697e8261dba5b439a15f5a6125f31760 (diff)
C-Docs: New structure
Change-Id: I73d107f94b28b138f3350a9e1eedb0555583a9ca Signed-off-by: Tibor Frank <tifrank@cisco.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md')
-rw-r--r--docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md68
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md b/docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..6dec4d918b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/content/methodology/test/reconfiguration.md
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+---
+title: "Reconfiguration"
+weight: 8
+---
+
+# Reconfiguration
+
+## Overview
+
+Reconf tests are designed to measure the impact of VPP re-configuration
+on data plane traffic.
+While VPP takes some measures against the traffic being
+entirely stopped for a prolonged time,
+the immediate forwarding rate varies during the re-configuration,
+as some configurations steps need the active dataplane worker threads
+to be stopped temporarily.
+
+As the usual methods of measuring throughput need multiple trial measurements
+with somewhat long durations, and the re-configuration process can also be long,
+finding an offered load which would result in zero loss
+during the re-configuration process would be time-consuming.
+
+Instead, reconf tests first find a througput value (lower bound for NDR)
+without re-configuration, and then maintain that ofered load
+during re-configuration. The measured loss count is then assumed to be caused
+by the re-configuration process. The result published by reconf tests
+is the effective blocked time, that is
+the loss count divided by the offered load.
+
+## Current Implementation
+
+Each reconf suite is based on a similar MLRsearch performance suite.
+
+MLRsearch parameters are changed to speed up the throughput discovery.
+For example, PDR is not searched for, and the final trial duration is shorter.
+
+The MLRsearch suite has to contain a configuration parameter
+that can be scaled up, e.g. number of tunnels or number of service chains.
+Currently, only increasing the scale is supported
+as the re-configuration operation. In future, scale decrease
+or other operations can be implemented.
+
+The traffic profile is not changed, so the traffic present is processed
+only by the smaller scale configuration. The added tunnels / chains
+are not targetted by the traffic.
+
+For the re-configuration, the same Robot Framework and Python libraries
+are used, as were used in the initial configuration, with the exception
+of the final calls that do not interact with VPP (e.g. starting
+virtual machines) being skipped to reduce the test overall duration.
+
+## Discussion
+
+Robot Framework introduces a certain overhead, which may affect timing
+of individual VPP API calls, which in turn may affect
+the number of packets lost.
+
+The exact calls executed may contain unnecessary info dumps, repeated commands,
+or commands which change a value that do not need to be changed (e.g. MTU).
+Thus, implementation details are affecting the results, even if their effect
+on the corresponding MLRsearch suite is negligible.
+
+The lower bound for NDR is the only value safe to be used when zero packets lost
+are expected without re-configuration. But different suites show different
+"jitter" in that value. For some suites, the lower bound is not tight,
+allowing full NIC buffers to drain quickly between worker pauses.
+For other suites, lower bound for NDR still has quite a large probability
+of non-zero packet loss even without re-configuration.