aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/resources
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'resources')
-rw-r--r--resources/libraries/python/PLRsearch/PLRsearch.py25
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/resources/libraries/python/PLRsearch/PLRsearch.py b/resources/libraries/python/PLRsearch/PLRsearch.py
index 8d6e1ffe71..326aa2e2d2 100644
--- a/resources/libraries/python/PLRsearch/PLRsearch.py
+++ b/resources/libraries/python/PLRsearch/PLRsearch.py
@@ -200,15 +200,30 @@ class PLRsearch:
focus_trackers,
)
measurement, average, stdev, avg1, avg2, focus_trackers = results
+ # Workaround for unsent packets and other anomalies.
+ measurement.plr_loss_count = min(
+ measurement.intended_count,
+ int(measurement.intended_count * measurement.loss_ratio + 0.9),
+ )
+ logging.debug(
+ f"loss ratio {measurement.plr_loss_count}"
+ f" / {measurement.intended_count}"
+ )
zeros += 1
# TODO: Ratio of fill rate to drain rate seems to have
# exponential impact. Make it configurable, or is 4:3 good enough?
- if measurement.loss_ratio >= self.packet_loss_ratio_target:
+ if measurement.plr_loss_count >= (
+ measurement.intended_count * self.packet_loss_ratio_target
+ ):
for _ in range(4 * zeros):
lossy_loads.append(measurement.intended_load)
- if measurement.loss_ratio > 0.0:
+ lossy_loads.sort()
zeros = 0
- lossy_loads.sort()
+ logging.debug("High enough loss, lossy loads added.")
+ else:
+ logging.debug(
+ f"Not a high loss, zero counter bumped to {zeros}."
+ )
if stop_time <= time.time():
return average, stdev
trial_result_list.append(measurement)
@@ -472,7 +487,7 @@ class PLRsearch:
trace("spread", spread)
for result in trial_result_list:
trace("for tr", result.intended_load)
- trace("lc", result.loss_count)
+ trace("plc", result.plr_loss_count)
trace("d", result.intended_duration)
# _rel_ values use units of intended_load (transactions per second).
log_avg_rel_loss_per_second = lfit_func(
@@ -485,7 +500,7 @@ class PLRsearch:
)
# Geometric probability computation for logarithms.
log_trial_likelihood = log_plus(0.0, -log_avg_abs_loss_per_trial)
- log_trial_likelihood *= -result.loss_count
+ log_trial_likelihood *= -result.plr_loss_count
log_trial_likelihood -= log_plus(0.0, +log_avg_abs_loss_per_trial)
log_likelihood += log_trial_likelihood
trace("avg_loss_per_trial", math.exp(log_avg_abs_loss_per_trial))